by jcskinner » Tue Jun 09, 2009 6:20 pm
Some people may be aware that the Irish Whiskey Society is teaming up with the Inland Waterways Association of Ireland and the Heritage Boat Association to bottle its first cask later this year.
The bottling, known as the 'Grand Crew', will make history later this Summer when it is brought down the Grand Canal from the distillery at Kilbeggan to Dublin, the first time whiskey has been transported by boat down the canal in over half a century.
IWS member and IWAI member Michael Slevin is the man who has been at the fulcrum of the project and brought all the elements together to make this happen. And so it was fitting that when it came time to decide on a cask to bottle, the tasting committee gathered in his home to do so.
On behalf of the Society, six of the board gathered at the home of Michael Slevin to assess six different casks from Cooley with a view to bottling one as the 'Grand Crew' bottling specially selected by the Irish Whiskey Society.
The nosing and tasting was conducted blind, but tasters were aware that there were three 8 year old casks and 3 9 year old casks.
It quickly became evident that the first three casks were the younger three. After tasting was complete, it was revealed that the casks were in chronological order of distillation and in fact were almost consecutive casks in Cooley's warehouse.
The casks were:
(1) K01/1 no. 57, an 8yo
(2) K01/1 no. 60, an 8yo
(3) K01/1 no. 61, an 8yo
(4) K00/6 no. 696 - 9yo
(5) K00/6 no. 697 - 9yo
(6) K00/6 no. 700 - 9yo
As Michael Slevin has noted, despite this near sequentiality, there was significant variety among the samples.
They were nosed firstly at 20% and then again at 40%, before being tasted at c. 40-50% and again at cask strength.
A consensus soon developed that three were superior to the remainder. These three were:
(3) K01/1 no. 61
(4) K00/6 no. 696
(6) K00/6 no. 700
Nosing at 20%:
Sample (1) showed some typical Tyrconnell fruitiness, a little green apple and sweetness but was otherwise sugary and fiery on the nose.
Sample (2) appeared to be quite bland, indicating some pear and grapeskin on the nose.
Sample (3) offered vanilla pod, some pepperiness, as well as the light fruitiness familiar from Tyrconnell.
Sample (4) had a fascinating nose, quite floral with hints of peach, apricot and lemongrass, as well as some grassiness.
Sample (5) was somewhat maltier than others, offering grain and some grass on the nose.
Sample (6) was complex on the nose, offering some citrus notes, leafiness and fruity acetic acid.
Nosing at 40% largely confirmed the above opinions, with the three favoured samples offering up some further top notes.
Sample (3) offered more citrus and grain at 40%, while sample (4) offered bananas and cut pear, and sample (6) offered some leather.
Tasting was conducted in two formal rounds at different strengths. In the first round, tasting was conducted at between 40% and 50% proof depending on taster's preference. A second round of tasting was conducted at between 50% and cask strength again dependent on taster's preference.
Despite three clear favourites from the nosing, we tasted all six samples carefully. However, the same three samples came to the fore.
Sample (1) was fruity, apply and very fiery, certainly too young and rough to bottle.
Sample (2) was oilier and grassier, somewhat more rounded but still young and unremarkable.
Sample (3) was pleasant, light and balanced, with good fruit and an impactful lengthy finish
Sample (4) offered an interesting if somewhat unbalanced array of exotic fruits, peaches, apricots, dried pear, almonds, grassiness and some malt. While fascinating, it did die somewhat quickly on the finish, however.
Sample (5) came across quite citric, with some mild malt and another shortened finish.
Sample (6) offered some pepper, apple pie, nuts and pear drops as well as a pleasant oiliness and a malty finish.
Debate soon centred upon the two older preferred samples, (4) and (6), casks 696 and 700 respectively. Both had their fans and all agreed that these two samples were the best two in the entire range we had received.
At this point, the six tasters present consulted with Adrian Phelan by telephone. Adrian had come to remarkably similar conclusions on his own, having considered all of the samples alone on a previous date.
After votes were cast, there was a very marginal preference for the somewhat unusual sample (4) – cask 696, over the more conventional sample (6) – cask 700.
Therefore, after nearly four hours of tasting, it was decided by the most narrow of margins to bottle cask number 696 as the 'Grand Crew' bottling, the first ever whiskey specially selected by the Irish Whiskey Society.
Limited numbers of bottles of this 'Grand Crew' will be available for purchase by IWS members later in the year.
Last edited by
jcskinner on Thu Jun 18, 2009 2:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.