by jcskinner » Sat Sep 04, 2010 9:44 pm
Bushmills or Tyrconnell?
A bit like asking 'wife or daughter'!
Both are essential loves of any Irish whiskey connoisseur, and both have unique and different appeals.
Personally, Bushmills is the true love. It's hard not to reach for the 21, 16, or the single casks or even a Black Bush without the mind casting back to that first time, that amazement when the taste hit the palate.
Sure, the 10 year old isn't for everyone (including me) nor the White Bush neither. But the Brogans and Irishman outputs show that Bush spirit in the 10 year old age range can exceed what the distillery put out under their own bottling.
Tyrconnell is a different beast entirely, but just as lovable in its own way. I think it excels the older it gets, and clearly it takes especially well to a good cask finish, as the Port, Madeira, Sherry and now Mallorcan finish bottlings reveal.
I'd take a young Tyrconnell over a White Bush any day. I'd have to stop and pause, but might still take it even over a Black Bush.
At 10 yo, the Tyrconnell wins out over Bush, unless the Bush is an independent bottling.
At 16, the Bush edges it (but I would say that - it's my all-time favourite go-to dram.) But only just. The 17 yo Tyrconnells have been exceptional.
I wonder how they'll go head to head at 21! If the Tyrconnell continues to improve, it will give even the extraordinary Bush 21 yo a run for its money.
Fair play to Cooley for the work they've done with Tyrconnell. It offers the old guard at Bushmills a few ideas as to how to innovate and freshen up the Bush range, which while still superb is beginning to look a little stale with no new products since the 1608 anniversary malt.