NOTE: This forum is no longer active. This is an archive copy of the forum as it was on 10 March 2018.
MyIrishHome wrote:First, is it called Kilbeggan or Locke's?
Second: I somewhere got the idea that the low wine is produced at Riverstown but then transported down to Kilbeggan for second destilation. Is this still the procedure or was just at the start?
/Uffe
IrishWhiskeyChaser wrote:I would imagine that Kilbeggan the blend will continue to be made in Riverstown.
MyIrishHome wrote:Thanks Adrian,
Do you know milling capacity, the size of washbacks, vort gravity, time of fermenting, yeast type, size of pot stills and so on?
/Uffe
MyIrishHome wrote:Do you know milling capacity, the size of washbacks, vort gravity, time of fermenting, yeast type, size of pot stills and so on?
MyIrishHome wrote:Do you mind if I copy that for my blogg? Of course I will direct people to the source
More questions. Do someone have a good link for more historical information on Brusna/Locke's/Kilbeggan destillery?
Fionnán wrote:... probably because they're out of the reserve malt-- any news on this front from anyone?
Fionnán wrote:hopefully sans caramel this time. If that does happen and if anyone has any of the old release hanging around it would be great to test them side by side to see what difference the kilbeggan wash still vs riverstown wash still makes
varizoltan wrote:some good news from Kilbeggan,
the waterwheel getting restored
http://www.businessandleadership.com/bu ... witterfeed
MyIrishHome wrote:An other thing I don't really get. In the article they state following. "The waterwheel dates back to the 19th century and powered the copper stills up until 1957 when Kilbeggan Distillery closed. " What do they mean with powered the copper still? Powered the distillery I understand but the copper stills. By the why, was they direct heated or did they use other methods?
I've seen the set up down there and the waterwheel would have been used to power the milling pumping etc but not the stills as you rightly guessed. I think they used direct fires down there in the old days and the only possible use the mill would have been in that regard would maybe to the large industrial bellows that were installed to fan the fires.
Optics only I believe; I'd prefer to see a more substantive announcement. From what I can see, they are setting up the general operation for a restricted range with high volume output. Which would probably undo all the good work done between both sites to date. Strange plan, given that the main driver for growth attributed to the company has been their ability to try new things and 'be different'.