NOTE: This forum is no longer active. This is an archive copy of the forum as it was on 10 March 2018.
DavidH wrote:I notice that the amylase is added as an ingredient, rather than coming from malted barley as it would in Irish whiskey. Not having any malt in the mix must have a big influence on flavour. It's a very interesting experiment. I guess none of the rest of us has tried a 100% unmalted barley whiskey but I'm sure we would all love to.
Please keep posting your progress. It's very inspiring and educational!
scotty wrote: Your comment is a point of interest David. I sincerely thank you for bringing this point of concern up.
I'm hoping that malted and unmaltedbarley is still the same wher flavor is concerned
scotty wrote:Another area of concern is emulating the water of Ireland. All i can find is this burton on the trent salts. I dont know what else to do. I will treat distilled water with the salts.
DavidH wrote:scotty wrote: Your comment is a point of interest David. I sincerely thank you for bringing this point of concern up.
I'm hoping that malted and unmaltedbarley is still the same wher flavor is concerned
The use of a high proportion of unmalted barley is what distinguishes Irish pot still whiskey from malt whiskey. They taste different so I'm assuming that is due to the proportion of malt. Malt is also a flavour in non-alcoholic drinks and foods (for example, Maltesers), I think.
I'm just speculating here. You know more about this process than I do. And even if there is a taste difference it's still worth trying. You might invent a great new whiskey!
scotty wrote:You mention the diference in flavor-- so are you telling me that a 100% malt does taste diferent from where only a portion of malst is used as needed to make the conversion of starch to sugar.
scotty wrote:Just wondering if pot still whiskey is used because it is cheaper to make??
scotty wrote:My reasoning is that since a malt is any grain that has been put through the malting process to activate the enzymes,; i am guessing that it wont make any difference in the end result if i use the amylases . Just guessing/hoping too.
DavidH wrote:scotty wrote:Just wondering if pot still whiskey is used because it is cheaper to make??
You are right, historically The British government imposed a tax on malt so Irish distillers replaced some of the malt with barley. The malt tax lasted until near the end of the 19th century. Distillers did not change back to all-malt when the tax was removed, however, because by that time "pure pot still" had become the accepted Irish style.
scotty wrote:So should this batch with the unmalted barley be called pot still whiskey
scotty wrote:Look what i found-- its closer than nothing and i dont know which one is correct any way--
http://www.thegrape.net/search.htm?sear ... y=0&step=2
DavidH wrote:scotty wrote:Look what i found-- its closer than nothing and i dont know which one is correct any way--
http://www.thegrape.net/search.htm?sear ... y=0&step=2
I am amazed to learn that these products exist.
I can see how they are useful for making beer, but I really wonder if they have any effect on whiskey. You start with distilled water, add impurities, then distil the water (plus spirit) again. So you are back where you started. The salts should be removed in the process. This doesn't happen with beer because beer is not distilled.